# Kappa Value For Agreement

Kappa`s P-value is rarely reported, probably because even relatively low Kappa values can still differ significantly from zero, but not of sufficient size to satisfy investigators. :66 However, its default error has been described and is calculated from different computer programs.  The higher the number of codes, the more resistant the kappa value is to the difference in observer accuracy. There is a declination of the Kappa value when the gap between the observational details widens Suppose you have analyzed data relating to a group of 50 people applying for a grant. Each request for assistance was read by two readers and each reader said “yes” or “no” to the proposal. Suppose that the data relating to the number of disagreements are as follows, A and B being readers, the data appearing on the main diagonal of the matrix (a) and d) the number of chords, and the off-diagonal data (b) and c) counting the number of disagreements: the increase in the number of codes leads to a gradually reduced increment at Kappa. If the number of codes is less than five, and especially if K = 2 is, the lower Kappa values are acceptable, but variability in prevalence must also be taken into account. For only two codes, the highest .80 kappa value of observers with .95 accuracy and the lowest value of kappa is .02 of observers with .80 accuracy. Percentage compliance calculation (dummy data).

In theory, confidence intervals are displayed by subtracting kappa from the value of the desired ci level once the standard kappa error is made. Since the most frequently desired value is 95%, Formula 1.96 is used as a constant multiplying the standard kappa error (SEκ). The confidence interval formula is as follows: to calculate Kappa, you must first calculate the observed compliance level as a percentage through multiple data collectors (dummy data). Therefore, the standard kappa error for the data in Figure 3, P = 0.94, pe = 0.57 and N = 222 The overall probability of random concordance is the probability that they agreed on yes or no, i.e. the disagreement rate is 14/16 or 0.875. The disagreement is due to the quantity, because the allocation is optimal. Kappa is 0.01. Kappa statistics are often used to test the reliability of interraters. The importance of evaluator reliability lies in the fact that it represents the extent to which the data collected in the study are correct representations of the variables measured.

The measure of the extent to which data collectors (evaluators) assign the same score to these same variables is called the reliability of the interrater. While there were a large number of methods for measuring the reliability of the interrater, it was traditionally measured as a percentage of concordance, calculated as the number of match values divided by the total number of points. . . .